Journal Title
AAPS Journal

AAPS J

ISSN / eISSN
1550-7416 / 1550-7416
Aims and Scope
The AAPS Journal, an official journal of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS), publishes novel and significant findings in the various areas of pharmaceutical sciences impacting human and veterinary therapeutics, including:

· Drug Design and Discovery

· Pharmaceutical Biotechnology

· Biopharmaceutics, Formulation, and Drug Delivery

· Metabolism and Transport

· Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacometrics

· Translational Research

· Clinical Evaluations and Therapeutic Outcomes

· Regulatory Science

We invite submissions under the following article types:

· Original Research Articles

· Reviews and Mini-reviews

· White Papers, Commentaries, and Editorials

· Meeting Reports

· Brief/Technical Reports and Rapid Communications

· Regulatory Notes

· Tutorials

· Protocols in the Pharmaceutical Sciences

In addition, The AAPS Journal publishes themes, organized by guest editors, which are focused on particular areas of current interest to our field.
Subject Area

PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY

CiteScore
6.50 View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category Quartile Rank
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics - Pharmaceutical Science Q2 #49/171
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2023) Quartile
PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY - SCIE Q2
H-index
96
Country/Area of Publication
UNITED STATES
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Publication Frequency
Quarterly
Year Publication Started
1999
Annual Article Volume
96
Open Access
NO
Contact
SPRINGER, 233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK , USA, NY, 10013
Verified Reviews
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.
Posted on 07/23/2021, it took three weeks to receive feedback on the major revisions, which were fairly constructive. It took two weeks to individually respond to the comments of both reviewers. The first reviewer had no significant issues, but the second reviewer raised a lot of questions, mainly due to a misunderstanding of several terms, which led them to believe that the data was inconsistent. It took another week to respond to each of the reviewer's comments. Then, after making minor revisions, the paper was accepted. The whole process took nearly three months. If it had been accepted in one go, it would have only taken a month.
2021-10-19

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started