Journal Title
CATENA

CATENA

ISSN / eISSN
0341-8162
Aims and Scope
Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment.
Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.
Subject Area

GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

WATER RESOURCES

SOIL SCIENCE

CiteScore
9.80 View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category Quartile Rank
Earth and Planetary Sciences - Earth-Surface Processes Q1 #6/164
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2023) Quartile
GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY - SCIE Q1
SOIL SCIENCE - SCIE Q1
WATER RESOURCES - SCIE Q1
H-index
106
Country/Area of Publication
GERMANY
Publisher
Elsevier
Publication Frequency
Monthly
Annual Article Volume
852
Open Access
NO
Contact
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
Verified Reviews
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.
Cezary Kabala, explicitly stated in the cover letter that I do not want this editor to handle the manuscript with the Chinese map; my revised manuscript R1 has addressed the reviewers' comments, and all reviewers recommended publication. However, this editor requested changes or deletion of the Chinese map, despite my explanation for its inclusion (1 depicting the southeastern coast of China; 2 reviewers suggested adding background information to support the discussion). R2 was then revised with a threatening tone and emotional content. In R3, I directly cited several recent articles published in Catena that included Chinese maps featuring the South China Sea and the Nine-Dash Line. This matter escalated to the editorial office, and in R4, the revision request became minor changes, but the editor still insisted on changing the map. Finally, I decided to withdraw the manuscript, and the editor agreed and suggested resubmitting with a revised map. I chose to submit it to Geoderma instead, without the accompaniment of the Polish editor Cezary Kabala.
2022-04-04
Sharing the submission process, the speed of feeling entering the track is not too slow, but it can't be said to be fast for sure.
Submitted in May 2020, reviewed and sent for evaluation after about half a month.
Received feedback in September, two reviewers, one likely rejected the submission and the other suggested minor revisions. The editor decided to reject it but encouraged a resubmission.
Submitted a revised version in October, without any modification marks as required for resubmission. After the editor reviewed it, it was sent back for further modifications.
In November, the revised manuscript was submitted again and reviewed by two reviewers.
In December, modification suggestions were received during Christmas, suggesting minor revisions.
Rushed to submit the modified version before New Year's Day.
Experience of more than a week with an assigned editor.
Entered the "decision in process" stage directly after more than 10 days.
Accepted in early January 2020.
2021-01-10

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started