Mitochondrial DNA Part B-Resources
Note: The following journal information is for reference only. Please check the journal website for updated information prior to submission.
Journal Title
Mitochondrial DNA Part B-Resources
MITOCHONDRIAL DNA B
ISSN / eISSN
2380-2359 / 2380-2359
Aims and Scope
This open access journal publishes high-quality and concise research articles reporting the sequence of full mitochondrial genomes, and short communications focusing on the physical, chemical, and biochemical aspects of mtDNA and proteins involved in mtDNA metabolism and interactions.
Subject Area
GENETICS & HEREDITY
CiteScore
1.30
View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
| Category | Quartile | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology - Genetics | Q4 | #295/328 |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology - Molecular Biology | Q4 | #350/380 |
Web of Science Core Collection
| Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
|---|---|
| Indexed | - |
| Category (Journal Citation Reports 2023) | Quartile |
|---|---|
| GENETICS & HEREDITY - SCIE | Q4 |
H-index
7
Country/Area of Publication
United Kingdom
Publisher
Taylor and Francis Ltd.
Annual Article Volume
749
Open Access
NO
Contact
2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON, England, OXON, OX14 4RN
Verified Reviews
1. After 20 days of submission, they sent it for external review, but surprisingly, they only modified the formatting and asked me to make the necessary changes accordingly.
2. It took a whole year for them to send it back for revisions. On February 16th, it finally went through external review by two experts. The feedback was okay, and I made changes to the content as suggested.
3. On March 19th, I sent it back for revisions, but it stayed with the editor for over a month, almost two months. It was not moving forward during this time.
4. Another 20 days for external review, with two reviewers. I received their feedback on June 9th and made the necessary revisions.
5. After sending it back for revisions, one reviewer had no major concerns. The assistant editor asked for minor changes in the figures and formatting. I don't understand why they didn't ask for these changes earlier.
6. On June 29th, the assistant editor requested additional changes in the figure captions, a very minor issue. Instead of addressing it all at once, they sent it back for revisions within a day.
7. Finally, on June 28th, it was returned to me. It has been 14 days since the last round of revisions, and I have no idea what the current status is. The outcome is still unknown.
12/6/2023 With Editor
13/6/2023 Decision Pending
16/6/2023 Revision Required
16/6/2023 Revision Incomplete
16/6/2023 Revised Manuscript Submitted
16/6/2023 With Journal Administrator
23/6/2023 With Editor
27/6/2023 Decision Pending
27/6/2023 Revision Required
28/6/2023 Revised Manuscript Submitted
28/6/2023 With Journal Administrator
30/6/2023 With Editor
12/7/2023 Decision Pending
Translated:
09/6/2023 With Journal Administrator
12/6/2023 With Editor
13/6/2023 Decision Pending
16/6/2023 Revision Required
16/6/2023 Revision Incomplete
16/6/2023 Revised Manuscript Submitted
16/6/2023 With Journal Administrator
23/6/2023 With Editor
27/6/2023 Decision Pending
27/6/2023 Revision Required
28/6/2023 Revised Manuscript Submitted
28/6/2023 With Journal Administrator
30/6/2023 With Editor
12/7/2023 Decision Pending
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now