Journal Title
BASIC RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY

BASIC RES CARDIOL

ISSN / eISSN
0300-8428 / 1435-1803
Aims and Scope
Basic Research in Cardiology is an international journal for cardiovascular research. It provides a forum for original and review articles related to experimental cardiology that meet its stringent scientific standards. Thus, it comprises all aspects related to the physiology and pathology of the structure and function of the heart and the cardiovascular system, including their regulation by neuronal and humoral mechanisms. The journal regularly receives articles from the fields of

- Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Biochemistry
- Biophysics
- Pharmacology
- Physiology and Pathology
- Clinical Cardiology

Fields of interest: Cardiology, Physiology, Pathology
Subject Area

CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS

CiteScore
16.50 View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category Quartile Rank
Medicine - Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine Q1 #10/354
Medicine - Physiology (medical) Q1 #5/102
Medicine - Physiology Q1 #11/182
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2023) Quartile
CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS - SCIE Q1
H-index
86
Country/Area of Publication
GERMANY
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Publication Frequency
Bimonthly
Year Publication Started
1937
Annual Article Volume
56
Open Access
NO
Contact
DR DIETRICH STEINKOPFF VERLAG, TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, HEIDELBERG, GERMANY, 69121
Verified Reviews
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.
The first draft was submitted for initial review for 3 weeks. The editor liked it and there were few comments from the reviewers. However, they "suggested" that I should contact a German professor to supplement the experiment with mice. In the second draft, as the German professor did not reply to my emails, I tried to supplement the experiment through other means. Reviewer 1 directly asserted that I did not ask the German professor for mice, saying "Never tried to request," and their attitude completely changed, almost to the point of swearing at me. They directly said "no surprise," which is no different from saying "bullshit" in context. Afterwards, the editor rejected the manuscript, citing the reason that we did not consult the professor. After arguing with them, the editor concluded that we did not ask for mice, which contradicts what we wrote in our response letter. They no longer consider the article. We then provided email evidence, but the editor claimed that they asked the professor themselves, just didn't send an email to consult them. Okay, fine... It's a German journal, with a German editor, German reviewers, and a German professor... If there is a conflict, just say so. There's no need to make it a matter of embarrassing Germany.
2021-09-20
Hello! After seeing your submission experience, I felt a little indignant on your behalf, but it's okay. It's their loss if they don't want your article. Your article will definitely be able to be published in a better journal. I have a question to consult with you. I just submitted an article, but I saw that the similarity rate is 34% and the single source similarity is 3%. Now I'm very anxious. Will it be directly rejected? What was the similarity rate shown by the system for you before? Thank you! I noticed that this similarity calculation software even includes the names of the authors' workplaces. Sigh!
2021-09-21

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started